Showing 141 - 150 of 150
This paper investigates pricing in laboratory markets when human players interact with an algorithm. We compare the degree of competition when exclusively humans interact to the case of one firm delegating its decisions to an algorithm, an n-player generalization of tit-for-tat. We further vary...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013414764
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013476499
In this experiment, we analyze the model of strategic trade policy proposed by Brander and Spencer (1985). Governments …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014066578
Information unraveling is an elegant theoretical argument suggesting that private information may be fully and voluntarily surrendered. The experimental literature has, however, failed to provide evidence of complete unraveling and has suggested senders' limited depth of reasoning as one...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014422323
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014430158
We contrast a standard deterministic signaling game with a variant where the signal-generating mechanism is subject to stochastic perturbations. In the theoretical part, we obtain a unique equilibrium with stochastic signals. This equilibrium is separating and has intuitive comparative-static...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014046412
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014228778
We investigate collusive pricing in laboratory markets when human players interact with an algorithm. We compare the degree of (tacit) collusion when exclusively humans interact to the case of one firm in the market delegating its decisions to an algorithm. We further vary whether participants...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013228135
stated beliefs against adverse outcomes of other decisions in the experiment. This raises two questions: (i) can we trust the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013325138
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008673762