Showing 1 - 10 of 124
Using a difference-in-differences approach and relying on conftdential supervisory data and an unique proprietary data set available at the European Central Bank related to the 2016 EU-wide stress test, this paper presents novel empirical evidence that supervisory scrutiny associated to stress...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012518263
Relying on confidential supervisory data related to the 2016 EU-wide stress test, this paper presents novel empirical evidence that supervisory scrutiny associated to stress testing has a disciplining effect on bank risk. We find that banks that participated in the 2016 EU-wide stress test...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013403472
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012512905
This paper provides the first empirical evidence on how home-country regulation and supervision affects bank risk-taking in host-country markets. We analyze lending by 136 banks to 8,253 firms in 1,513 different localities across 13 countries. We find strong evidence that laxer regulatory...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013068368
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014234520
We study how banks react to policy announcements during the representative policy cycle of consultation and policy publication. We use unique data covering the population of all mortgage transactions in the UK complemented with regulatory risk assessments of banks and their supervisory...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012421476
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012813553
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003878356
Using a difference-in-differences approach and relying on confidential supervisory data and an unique proprietary data set available at the European Central Bank related to the 2016 EU-wide stress test, this paper presents novel empirical evidence that supervisory scrutiny associated to stress...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013227325
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002504660