Showing 1 - 10 of 115
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003777820
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003285025
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003517961
Despite its importance, voting in the elections of corporate boards of directors remains relatively unexplored in the empirical literature. We construct a comprehensive dataset of 3,204,890 mutual fund votes in director elections that took place between July 2003 and June 2005. We find...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012711477
We show that institutional shareholders of acquiring companies on average do not lose money around public merger announcements, because they also hold substantial stakes in the targets and make up for the losses from the former with the gains from the latter. Depending on their holdings in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012713347
We show that institutional shareholders of acquiring companies on average do not lose money around public merger announcements, because they hold substantial stakes in the targets and make up for the losses from the acquirers with the gains from the targets. Depending on their holdings in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005210556
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008108999
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008881095
This paper studies voting in corporate director elections. We construct a comprehensive data set of 2,058,788 mutual fund votes over a two-year period. We find systematic heterogeneity in voting: some funds are consistently more management-friendly than others. We also establish the presence of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008872317
Despite its importance, voting in the elections of corporate boards of directors remains relatively unexplored in the empirical literature. We construct a comprehensive dataset of 3,204,890 mutual fund votes in director elections that took place between July 2003 and June 2005. We find...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005553429