Showing 1 - 9 of 9
An important reason why people violate expected utility theory is probability weighting. Previous studies on the probability weighting function typically assume a specific parametric form, exclude heterogeneity in individual preferences, and exclusively consider monetary decision making. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009203796
This paper proposes a quantitative modification of standard utility elicitation procedures, such as the probability and certainty equivalence methods, to correct for commonly observed violations of expected utility. Traditionally, decision analysis assumes expected utility not only for the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009218192
This comprehensive collection brings together more than 50 contributions from some of the most influential researchers in health economics. It authoritatively covers theoretical and empirical issues in health economics, with a balanced range of material on equity and efficiency in health care...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011174071
The aim of The Elgar Companion to Health Economics is to take an audience of advanced undergraduates, postgraduates and researchers to the frontier of research in health economics, by providing them with short and easily readable introductions to key topics. The volume brings together 50...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011180401
This paper examines applications of non-expected utility in the health domain. The most widely used utility model in health economics, the time-linear QALY model, assumes (i) separability of quality of life and life duration, and (ii) linearity of the utility for life duration. We perform new...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010547275
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005239439
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005239513
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006089172
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006092208