Showing 1 - 10 of 13
This paper provides a life-cycle framework for weighing up the insurance value of disability benefi ts against the incentive cost. Within this framework, we estimate the life-cycle risks that individuals face in the US, as well as the parameters governing the disability insurance program, using...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003964321
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011379368
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010405568
We show the extent of errors made in the award of disability insurance using matched survey-administrative data. False rejections (Type I errors) are widespread and characterized by large gender differences. Women with a severe, work-limiting, permanent impairment are 20 percentage points more...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012858138
We show the extent of errors made in the award of disability insurance using matched survey-administrative data. False rejections (Type I errors) are widespread, and there are large gender differences in these type I error rates. Women with a severe, work-limiting, permanent impairment are 20...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012480457
This paper provides a life-cycle framework for weighing up the insurance value of disability benefits against the incentive cost. Within this framework, we estimate the life-cycle risks that individuals face in the US, as well as the parameters governing the disability insurance program, using...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012462690
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003966958
We show the extent of errors made in the award of disability insurance using matched survey-administrative data. False rejections (Type I errors) are widespread, and there are large gender differences in these type I error rates. Women with a severe, work-limiting, permanent impairment are 20...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012135980
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012164089
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012170738