Showing 1 - 10 of 30
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010880222
In this working paper we demonstrate that some of the statistical tests used by Huang and Smith in a recent Land Economics article (74(2 1998): 186-202) were erroneous, and raise concerns about their corresponding conclusions. Specifically, using data from one of the studies that they showcase,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010882461
This paper utilizes laboratory and field experiments to test the use of a provision point mechanism to finance renewable energy programs, commonly known as green pricing programs. The mechanism solicits discrete contributions towards a provision threshold using a money-back guarantee for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921168
Using data from two studies that elicited nitrate health risk and exposure perceptions before and after a well testing program, this paper investigates whether participants update their risk perceptions with new infonnation. Graphical analyses demonstrate that, in the aggregate, updating occurs...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921173
Using a multi-site valuation study of groundwater quality, this paper compares the accuracy of alternative methods of transferring values from study sites to policy sites. Transferring benefit functions is more accurate than transfers of average contingent values. Relative accuracy is highly...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921177
Two methods for calibrating discrete choice contingent valuation responses – the dichotomous choice with followup certainty question method of Champ et al. (1997) and the multiple bounded method of Welsh and Poe (1998) – are evaluated using data from a field validity comparison of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921184
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921226
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921227
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921233
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921237