Showing 1 - 10 of 17
We investigate whether risk seeking or non-concave utility functions can help to explain the cross-sectional pattern0 of stock returns. For this purpose, we analyze the stochastic dominance efficiency classification of the value-weighted market portfolio relative to benchmark portfolios based on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010324879
We investigate whether risk seeking or non-concave utility functions can help to explain the cross-sectional pattern0 of stock returns. For this purpose, we analyze the stochastic dominance efficiency classification of the value-weighted market portfolio relative to benchmark portfolios based on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011326942
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003749158
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002135599
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003133543
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001689309
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001693585
Empirically, co-skewness of asset returns seems to explain a substantial part of the cross-sectional variation of mean return not explained by beta. Thisfinding is typically interpreted in terms of a risk averse representativeinvestor with a cubic utility function. This comment questions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012762818
We investigate whether risk seeking or non-concave utility functions can help to explain the cross-sectional pattern of stock returns. For this purpose, we analyze the stochastic dominance efficiency classification of the value-weighted market portfolio relative to benchmark portfolios based on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012713593
Empirically, co-skewness of asset returns seems to explain a substantial part of the cross-sectional variation of mean return not explained by beta. This finding is typically interpreted in terms of a risk averse representative investor with a cubic utility function. This paper questions this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005213462