Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Can neural networks learn to select an alternative based on a systematic aggregation of conflicting individual preferences (i.e. a 'voting rule')? And if so, which voting rule best describes their behavior? We show that a prominent neural network can be trained to respect two fundamental...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011558254
It is proved that, among all restricted preference domains that guarantee consistency (i.e. transitivity) of pairwise majority voting, the single-peaked domain is the only minimally rich and connected domain that contains two completely reversed strict preference orders. It is argued that this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011558266
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003827625
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010389617
We study the effect on the participation rate of employing different voting rules in the context of the problem to allocate a fixed monetary budget to two different public projects. Specifically, we compare the mean rule according to which the average of the individually proposed allocations is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012818254
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012820343
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013275536
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013207217
Judgement aggregation is a model of social choice in which the space of social alternatives is the set of consistent evaluations ("views") on a family of logically interconnected propositions, or yes/no-issues. Yet, simply complying with the majority opinion in each issue often yields a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010210604
In this paper, we classify all maximal peak-pit Condorcet domains of maximal width for n ≤ 5 alternatives. To achieve this, we bring together ideas from several branches of combinatorics. The main tool used in the classification is the ideal of a domain. In contrast to the size of maximal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012295717