character. The grand coalition was always the efficientcoalition,whereas the values of the 2-personcoalitions are varied such … that they lead to an efficiency loss inthe range of6.7 up to 30 percent. Furthermore, the 2-person coalition implies social … huge majority of proposers choosethe inefficient and unfair 2-person coalition. Proposer inducedefficiencylosses vary …

)The coalition decision, (ii) proposers' demand behavior in 2- and 3-personultimatum subgames, and (iii) theresponders' behavior in …

This paper reports the results of experiments involving a 3-person coalition formation game with an ultimatum … bargaining character. The grand coalition was always the efficient coalition decision, whereas the values of the 2-person … coalition implies social exclusion, since the not chosen member always receives a payoff of zero. Consistent with results …