Showing 1 - 10 of 18
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005229913
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005205441
This study uses a pooled matched-sample for the years 1977 and 1987 to examine the strategic adaptability of motor carriers, in the post-deregulation environment in the context of financial mobility. This concept, first delineated by Donaldson, refers to the strategic inventorying of financial...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005074958
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006799621
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007684242
Cluster analysis of the Morningstar 500 style classifications (growth, blend, and value) of large-cap mutual funds identifies three homogeneous style groups: growth and two versions of value. The mix of Morningstar styles in each identified cluster reflects problems in correctly classifying fund...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012747364
With respect to its small-cap funds, the Morningstar category rating is preferred to the Morningstar star rating with respect to the preponderance of its associations with both the Jensen Alpha and Sharpe Index. But, neither captures the entirety of the Sharpe Index and, especially, the Jensen...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012750181
What the study findings say is that there are identified input/output and profile variables that are significantly different between the Morningstar 500 [1999] large-cap mutual funds that are DEA performance-efficient and inefficient. The Sharpe index represents the DEA output variable.That is,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012750195
Only 11 of the 58 sample small-cap mutual funds are DEA efficient, and, of these, value funds represent by far the largest percentage. Twenty-five funds are least inefficient and 22 are inefficient. The mutual funds that are managerially inefficient tend to have the largest values for the seven...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012751469
This study analyzed a 1988 matched sample data of 176 foreign and domestic-owned U.S. banks that have domestic only offices. This was done to test whether the balance sheet strategies of foreign-owned U.S. banks in domestic markets differ from those of domestic owned banks. The primary impetus...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013007817