Showing 1 - 10 of 96
Some multinationals use the parent company as a lender to the group, whereas others set up an internal bank in a low tax jurisdiction. This paper discusses the link between capital structure choices and tax planning motives in multinational groups. We model the trade-off between the use of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011872932
This paper shows that the OECD inclusive framework of Pillar Two fails to implement the claimed 15% minimum corporate tax for all subsidiaries of multinational corporations that are not shell companies. The reason is that the Substance-based Income Exclusion of Pillar Two allows to tax-deduct...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014233974
It is observed in the real world that taxes matter for location decisions and that multinationals shift profits by transfer pricing. The US and Canada use Formula Apportionment (FA) to tax corporate income, and the EU is debating a switch from Separate Accounting (SA) to FA. This paper develops...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011536999
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001579106
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014378877
We study how harmonization of corporate tax systems affects the stability of international cartels. We show that tax base harmonization reinforces collusive agreements, while harmonization of corporate tax rates may destabilize or stabilize cartels. We also find that bilateral and full...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014026279
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013169801
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013423471
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014289157
This paper investigates the choice of apportionment factors under a corporate tax system of Formula Apportionment. In contrast to perceived wisdom, we show that the apportionment formula contains both mobile (capital) and immobile (labor) factors if jurisdictions are granted full fiscal autonomy...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013316891