Showing 1 - 10 of 35
The main rationale for policy intervention in debt renegotiation is to enhance such activity when foreclosures are perceived to be inefficiently high. We examine the ability of the government to influence debt renegotiation by empirically evaluating the effects of the 2009 Home Affordable...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010352185
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009492503
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011347948
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009622488
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010372482
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009683340
Yes, it did. We use exogenous variation in banks' incentives to conform to the standards of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) around regulatory exam dates to trace out the effect of the CRA on lending activity. Our empirical strategy compares lending behavior of banks undergoing CRA exams...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013096848
We evaluate the effects of the 2009 Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) that provided intermediaries with sizeable financial incentives to renegotiate mortgages. HAMP increased intensity of renegotiations and prevented substantial number of foreclosures but reached just one-third of its...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013101335
We find that regulators can implement identical rules inconsistently due to differences in their institutional design and incentives and this behavior adversely impacts the effectiveness with which regulation is implemented. We study supervisory decisions of U.S. banking regulators and exploit a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013091882
US state chartered commercial banks are supervised alternately by state and federal regulators. Each regulator supervises a given bank for a fixed time period according to a predetermined rotation schedule. We use unique data to examine differences between federal and state regulators for these...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013112843