Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Negotiators in intergroup conflict often represent a constituency that does not agree on the strategy their representative should follow — some constituents may favor a competitive, rigid stance, while other may favor a cooperative, conciliatory stance. Prior research has repeatedly shown that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014168740
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008668755
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003924767
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009007196
Deception is a common bargaining tactic that has also often been described as a form of unethical behavior. One reason why deception could be considered unethical is that it may evoke false expectations in others. In the current article we investigated false expectations that may be raised by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013123284
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008353392
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008380159
Research on information sharing in group decision-making has widely assumed a cooperative context and focused on the exchange of shared or unshared information in the hidden profile paradigm (Stasser & Titus, 1985, 1987), thereby neglecting the role of information importance. We argue that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014194784
The relation between social value orientation and the use of deception was studied in two experiments. Results showed that proself bargainers used deception mainly to increase their own outcomes. This was different for prosocial bargainers. Prosocial bargainers used deception often against...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014194885
In two experiments we studied the relation between dependency and deception in the ultimatum bargaining game. Participants could deceive the other player about the value of the chips they bargained over. Dependency was manipulated by manipulating the consequences of rejecting a proposal for both...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014220740