Showing 1 - 10 of 11
We examine how Big 4 auditors compete for new private clients. We find evidence suggesting that Big 4 auditors offer fee discounts to attract non-Big 4 private clients to experience attributes of their brand name audit services. We also find that to attract clients from competing Big 4...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014235451
Big 6 market shares based on aggregate national data have been used in prior research to infer market leadership and industry expertise, and to differentiate Big 6 accounting firms from one another. In this study it is demonstrated that further differences exist with respect to city-specific...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009448091
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005546319
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006228396
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006051172
Ferguson "et al." (2003) report that audit industry fee premia primarily reside with joint national and city-specific industry leadership as opposed to merely firm-wide (national) industry expertise, suggesting auditor choice among the Big 5 is best conceptualized on joint industry...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005659121
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001047548
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006762412
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006949577
Big 6 audit market shares based on aggregate national data have been used in prior research to infer market leadership and industry expertise, and to differentiate Big 6 accounting firms from one another. In this study it is demonstrated that further differences exist with respect to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012789872