Showing 1 - 10 of 26
We argue in favour of the shareholder model of the firm for three main reasons. First, serving multiple stakeholders leads to ill-defined property rights. What sounds like a fair compromise between stakeholders can easily evolve in a permanent struggle between the stakeholders about the ultimate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011373820
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003929259
We argue in favour of the shareholder model of the firm for three main reasons. First, serving multiple stakeholders leads to ill-defined property rights. What sounds like a fair compromise between stakeholders can easily evolve in a permanent struggle between the stakeholders about the ultimate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003747647
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003639733
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003645109
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003664320
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003630541
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003756663
their outside option. Empirical results for Denmark, Portugal and the United States show that Denmark is closest to the … first-best outcome, while Portugal and the United States deviate in different ways. Coordination in wage bargaining and …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010276828
We argue in favour of the shareholder model of the firm for three main reasons. First, serving multiple stakeholders leads to ill-defined property rights. What sounds like a fair compromise between stakeholders can easily evolve in a permanent struggle between the stakeholders about the ultimate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010276859