Showing 1 - 10 of 12
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003281314
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003688426
Should education be subsidized for the purpose of redistribution? The usual argument against subsidies to education above the primary level is that the rich take up most education, so a subsidy would increase inequality. We show that there is a counteracting effect: an increase in the stock of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011400867
Should education be subsidized for the purpose of redistribution? The usual argument against subsidies to education above the primary level is that the rich take up most education, so a subsidy would increase inequality. We show that there is a counteracting effect: an increase in the stock of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011317437
Estimates of the effect of education on GDP (the social return) have been hard to reconcile with micro evidence on the private return to schooling. We present a simple explanation combining two ideas: imperfect substitution and endogenous skill-biased technological progress and use cross-country...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011325967
When types of workers are imperfect substitutes, the Mincerian rate of return to human capital is negatively related to the supply of human capital. We work out a simple model for the joint evolution of output and wage dispersion. We estimate this model using cross-country panel data on GDP and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011408972
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001639506
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001611759
Should education be subsidized for the purpose of redistribution? The usual argument against subsidies to education above the primary level is that the rich take up most education, so a subsidy would increase inequality. We show that there is a counteracting effect: an increase in the stock of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001626083
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001756972