Showing 1 - 10 of 24
The literature of welfare-maximising greenhouse gas emission reduction strategies pays remarkably little attention to equity. This paper introduces three ways to consider efficiency and equity simultaneously. The first method, inspired by Kant and Rawls, maximises net present welfare, without...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011608505
Uncertainty plays a significant role in evaluating climate policy, and fattailed uncertainty may dominate policy advice. Should we make our utmost effort to prevent the arbitrarily large impacts of climate change under deep uncertainty? In order to answer to this question we propose an new way...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010392465
This paper surveys the literature on the economic impact of climate change. Different methods have been used to estimate the impact of climate change on human welfare. Studies agree that there are positive and negative impacts. In the short term, positive impacts may dominate, but these are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008905406
The European Commission did not publish a cost-benefit analysis for its 2020 climate package. This paper fills that gap, comparing the marginal costs and benefits of greenhouse gas emission reduction. The uncertainty about the marginal costs of climate change is large and skewed, and estimates...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008905742
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003603289
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009380848
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010471678
Uncertainty plays a significant role in evaluating climate policy, and fattailed uncertainty may dominate policy advice. Should we make our utmost effort to prevent the arbitrarily large impacts of climate change under deep uncertainty? In order to answer to this question we propose an new way...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009271275
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003363149
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001648030