Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005781247
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005783278
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005783286
Over the years, egalitarian philosophers have made some challenging claims about the nature of egalitarianism. They have argued that the Rawlsian leximin principle is not an egalitarian idea; that egalitarian reasoning should make us reject the Pareto principle; that the numbers should not count...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005487118
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005646761
In this paper, we suggerst that one plausible view is to keep us responsible for the parts of the consequences that are independent of the factors beyond our control. Within the framework of a first best taxation problem, we present and characterise a redistributive mechanism that both satisfies...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005646765
Many have questioned approaches to social choices that demand much interpersonal comparability of utility, arguing that such comparability is hard to implement in practice. In this paper, extending a result of Blackorby, Bossert, and Donaldson (1999),we prove that a very strong informational...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005646777
We generalize Hammond's characterisation of leximin by introducing a very weak two-person equity condition. In addition to strengthening the defence of the leximin principle, this result is of interest from a more technical point of view. Contrary to the present understanding in the literature...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005646782
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005671987
The basic problem in poverty measurement is how to weigh the income of different groups. This is a normative problem on which people differ in opinion, and hence we should seek a way of dealing with the issue that takes into account this plurality. In the paper, we suggest an approach to poverty...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005672001