Showing 1 - 10 of 64
This paper presents an experimental investigation of the three ambient-based mechanisms proposed by Segerson [J. Environ. Econom. Management 15, 87-98 (1988)] for controlling emissions from a group of nonpoint source polluters: a marginal tax/subsidy, a fixed penalty, and a mechanism that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921279
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005290960
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009392468
In this paper we build on a voluntary mechanism introduced by Segerson and Wu (2006) that uses the threat of an ambient tax to induce nonpoint source polluters to reduce emissions. In addition to reviewing Segerson and Wu's policy, we propose a new voluntary/threat policy that offers some...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005060324
This article considers whether communication can improve the efficacy of incentive mechanisms designed to correct the problem of moral hazard in groups. In particular, we use experimental economics methods to study environmental targeting instruments proposed by Segerson (1988) for regulating a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005568406
Recent papers show that in group decisions individuals have social preferences for efficiency and equity. However, the effect of social preferences on voting, the predominant funding mechanism for public goods, has not been thoroughly examined. This study investigates whether voting decisions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921329
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921609
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008387067
Public referenda are frequently used to determine the provision of public goods. As public programs have distributional consequences, a compelling question is what impact, if any, do social preferences have on voting behavior. This paper explores this issue using laboratory experiments wherein...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008522576
Public referenda are frequently used to determine the provision of public goods. As public programs have distributional consequences, a compelling question is what role if any social preferences have on voting behavior. This paper explores this issue using laboratory experiments wherein voting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004979531