Showing 1 - 10 of 80
Differences in annual publication counts may reflect the dynamic of scientific progress. Declining annual numbers of publications may be interpreted as missing progress in field-specific knowledge. In this paper, we present empirical results on dynamics of progress in economic fields (defined by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014469872
In socio-economic sciences the RePEc network (Research Papers in Economics) has become an essential source both for the spread of existing and new economic research. Furthermore the calculation of rankings for authors and academic institutions play a central role. We provide some cautionary...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010312126
This study is intended to facilitate fair research evaluations in economics. Field- and time-normalization of citation impact is the standard method in bibliometrics. Since citation rates for journal papers differ substantially across publication years and Journal of Economic Literature (JEL)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015256817
In dem vorliegenden Artikel werden die Working Paper und Policy Paper Reihen wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Institute aus dem deutschsprachigen Raum unter bibliometrischen Gesichtspunkten analysiert. Dazu wurden entsprechende Indikatoren, wie z.B. Impaktfaktoren, von der Webseite RePEc...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015263084
In this article, we revisit the analysis of Laband and Tollison (2006) who documented that articles with two authors in alphabetical order are cited much more often than non-alphabetized papers with two authors in the American Economic Review and the American Journal of Agricultural Economics....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015263994
We investigate whether articles in economics that are freely available on the web have a citation advantage over articles with a gated access. Our sample consists of articles from 2005 from 13 economic journals (including the top five journals). In addition to standard mean comparisons we also...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015243046
This articles investigates the recent trends in co-authorship in economics. Using data from more than 700.000 journal articles we show that the average number of authors per article has increased over the last years. This process is likely to be continued in the future. In a regression analysis...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015248691
This article updates Kelly and Bruestle (2011) by illustrating how publication trends in different subject categories in economics evolved from 2007 to 2013. Using data from RePEc we show that the largest increase in the relative share was for articles published in JEL category Q...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015249018
We construct a meta–ranking of 315 economics journals based on 38 different individual rankings. Our ranking incorporates both bibliometric measures from three different databases (Web of Knowledge, RePEc and Google Scholar) and previous rankings in the literature. Furthermore, we account for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015250491
This paper reviews standard ranking aggregation approaches in bibliometric analysis. These include the arithmetic and the harmonic mean. We also present two less-well known aggregation schemes, lexicographic and graphicolexic, which are based on the order of the rankings. Finally, we introduce...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015250599