Showing 1 - 10 of 113
We consider takeover bidding in a Cournot oligopoly when firms have private information concerning the synergy effect of merging with a takeover target. Two auction rules are considered: standard first-price and profit-share auctions, supplemented by entry fees. Since non-merged firms benefit...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008822617
The literature on license auctions for process innovations in oligopoly assumed that the auctioneer reveals the winning bid and stressed that this gives firms an incentive to signal strength through their bids, to the benefit of the innovator. In the present paper we examine whether revealing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010378352
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011487305
If bidders are uncertain whether the auctioneer sticks to the announced reserve, some bidders respond by not bidding, speculating that the auctioneer may revoke the reserve. However, the reserve inadvertently signals the auctioneer's type, which drives a unique separating and a multitude of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009781360
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000888285
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000837791
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000960063
In a recurring auction early bids may reveal bidders' types, which in turn affects bidding in later auctions. Bidders take this into account and may bid in a way that conceals their private information until the last auction is played. The present paper analyzes the equilibrium of a sequence of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003848869
The literature on R&D contests implicitly assumes that contestants submit their innovation regardless of its value. This ignores a potential adverse selection problem. The present paper analyzes the procurement of innovations when the procurer cannot commit to never bargain with innovators who...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003848872
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003410100