Showing 1 - 8 of 8
GRUBB’S RECENT PAPERS (2003, 2004, 2006B) ARE AIMED AT nothing less than rewriting important chapters of early American history. Our goal in both our AER and EJW comments was a negative one, to dissuade readers from accepting Grubb’s views and data. We are humbled by the complexity...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008484338
Farley Grubb has developed an ambitious new money-stock time series for colonial Pennsylvania that uses the ingenious method of examining newspaper advertisements promising rewards (e.g., for help in catching runaway slaves) to estimate monies in circulation (Grubb 2004). Grubb asserts that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008484406
Farley W. Grubb's recent papers on the early U.S. monetary system would be important contributions to the common currency area literature were not most of their historical assertions questionable and their key assumption—that the medium of exchange can be inferred from the unit of account—...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005571039
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003203265
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003203392
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006810753
If they could be believed, Farley W. Grubb's recent papers on the early U.S. monetary system would be important contributions to scholarship and public policy. This paper shows, however, that Grubb's papers should not be believed. Grubb's key assumption, that the medium of exchange can be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014073776
Although ingenious, Farley Grubb's (2004) recent money supply estimates for colonial Pennsylvania are too inaccurate to be of use to scholars. "Pounds" in runaway advertisements do not invariably refer to Pennsylvania's bills of credit, as Grubb asserts, but to her unit of account money....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014066380