Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003869996
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002494879
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001793401
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010343642
Firms that substantially increase capital investments subsequently achieve negative benchmark-adjusted returns. The negative abnormal capital investment/return relation is shown to be stronger for firms that have greater investment discretion, i.e., firms with higher cash flows and lower debt...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012762779
This paper presents evidence that suggests that in Japan, corporate ownership structure affects the relation between capital investment expenditures and firm performance. Specifically, there is a negative relation between capital expenditures and subsequent risk-adjusted returns amongst keiretsu...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012739803
Firms that spend the most on capital investments relative to their sales or total assets, subsequently achieve negative benchmark-adjusted returns. We consider two hypotheses to explain these returns. The first explanation, that firms artificially increase cash flows to fund investment...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012740595
Firms that substantially increase capital investments subsequently achieve negative benchmark-adjusted returns. The negative abnormal capital investment/return relation is shown to be stronger for firms that have greater investment discretion, i.e., firms with higher cash flows and lower debt...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012468746
The negative relation between capital investments and subsequent stock returns, found in the United States, is not observed in Japan, which is inconsistent with the risk-based explanation. More specifically, we find no significant relation between capital expenditures ("CE") and subsequent stock...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005023925
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006692511