Showing 1 - 10 of 10
In this paper, we analyze the equilibrium of a sequential game-theoretical model of lobbying, due to Groseclose and Snyder (1996), describing a legislature that vote over two alternatives, where two opposing lobbies, Lobby 0 and Lobby 1, compete by bidding for legislators’ votes. In this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009225867
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003904212
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009579372
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009665276
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009624380
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010998898
In this paper, we analyze the equilibrium of a sequential game-theoretical model of lobbying, due to Groseclose and Snyder (1996), describing a legislature that vote over two alternatives, where two opposing lobbies compete by bidding for legislators?votes. In this model, the lobbyist moving...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011004761
In this paper, we analyze the equilibrium of a sequential game-theoretical model of lobbying, due to Groseclose and Snyder (1996), describing a legislature that vote over two alternatives, where two opposing lobbies compete by bidding for legislators?votes. In this model, the lobbyist moving...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011268412
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009989570
In this paper, we analyze the equilibrium of a sequential game-theoretical model of lobbying, due to Groseclose and Snyder (1996), describing a legislature that vote over two alternatives, where two opposing lobbies compete by bidding for legislators?votes. In this model, the lobbyist moving...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011154532