Showing 1 - 10 of 78
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002188452
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001801307
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003052600
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013424339
This paper provides a unified explanation for why blacks commit more crime, are located in poorer neighborhoods and receive lower wages than whites. If everybody believes that blacks are more criminal than whites - even if there is no basis for this - then blacks are offered lower wages and, as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005419515
We highlight the role of commuting cost, location and housing market in crime decision. By assuming that all crimes are committed in the central business district and that criminals create both positive and negative externalities to each other, we find that high wages or large levels of police...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005419518
We analyze an oligopoly model in which differentiated criminal organizations globally compete on criminal activities and engage in local corruption to avoid punishment. When law enforcers are sufficiently well-paid, difficult to bribe and corruption detection highly probable, we show that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005419529
Delinquents are embedded in a network of relationships. Social ties among delinquents are modelled by means of a graph where delinquents compete for a booty and benefit from local interactions with their neighbors. Each delinquent decides in a non cooperative way how much delinquency effort he...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009317948
We develop a model in which delinquents compete with each other in criminal activities but may benefit from being friends with other criminals by learning and acquiring proper know-how on the crime business. By taking the social network connecting agents as given, we study the subgame perfect...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010851398
We study peer effects in crime by analyzing co-offending networks. We first provide a credible estimate of peer effects in these networks equal to 0.17. This estimate implies a social multiplier of 1.2 for those individuals linked to only one co-offender and a social multiplier of 2 for those...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010751644