Showing 1 - 10 of 203
During the last three decades the ascent of behavioral economics clearly helped tobring down artificial disciplinary boundaries between psychology and economics.Noting that behavioral economics seems still under the spell of the rational choicetradition – and, indirectly, of behaviorism – we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866402
This paper considers a matchmaker game in the Shapley-Shubik(1971) (one-to-one) assignment problem. Each …rm proposes how muchit is willing to pay each worker if they are matched. Each worker alsoproposes which salary she is willing to accept from each …rm if they arematched. The matchmaker...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009302542
In line with the widely applied principle of just deserts, we assume that the severityof the penalty on a contract offender increases in the harm on the other. Whenthis principle holds, the influence of the efficiency of the agreement on the incentivesto abide by it crucially depends on whether...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866436
We experimentally investigate how affective processes influence proposers’and responders’ behaviour in the Ultimatum Game. Using a dualsystemapproach, we tax cognitive resources through time pressure andcognitive load to enhance the influence of affective processes on behaviour.We find that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866456
We report on an experiment designed to explore whether allowing individualsto voice their anger prevents costly punishment. For this sake, weuse an ultimatum minigame and distinguish two treatments: one in whichresponders can only accept or reject the o®er, and the other in which theycan also...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866528
Can two negotiators fail to agree when both the size of the surplus and the rationalityof the negotiators are common knowledge? We show that the answer is affirmative.When the negotiators can make irrevocable commitments at a low but positive cost,the unique symmetric equilibrium entails...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866588
Experiments suggest that communication increases the contribution topublic goods (Ledyard, 1995). There is also evidence that, when contemplatinga lie, people trade off their private benefit from the lie with theharm it inflicts on others (Gneezy, 2005). We develop a model of bilateralpre-play...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866652
Systematic experiments with distribution games (for a survey, see Roth, 1995, ) haveshown that participants are strongly motivated by fairness and efficiency considerations.This evidence, however, results mainly from experimental designs asking directly for sharingmonetary rewards. But even when...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866809
demand their wages, i. e.when they are in a relatively strong bargaining position. …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866814
To commit credibly in bargaining is crucial: In the ultimatum game with its one–sided early commitment power the … simultaneouslythe (a)symmetric Nash(1950)–bargaining solution, however, predicts (moreor less) equal shares. Relying on a continuous …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866908