Showing 1 - 10 of 509
Atypical employment arrangements such as agency temporary work and contracting have long been criticized as offering more precarious and unstable work than regular employment. Using data from two datasets - the CAEAS and the NLSY79 we determine whether workers who take such jobs rather than...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003824964
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003892294
Atypical work arrangements have long been criticized as offering more precarious and lower paid work than regular open-ended employment. In an important paper, Booth et al. (2002) were among the first to recognize that notwithstanding their potential deficiencies, such jobs also functioned as a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003900589
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003488914
Atypical employment, such as temporary, on-call, and contract work, has been found disproportionately to attract the jobless. But there is no consensus in the literature as to the labour market consequences of such job choice by unemployed individuals. Using data from the Current Population...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003472772
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003378759
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011346143
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003842307
Alternative work arrangements (AWAs), such as contracting, consulting, and temporary work, have been criticized as providing only atypical, even precarious, employment. Yet they may also allow workers to locate suitable job matches. Exploiting data from all four Contingent and Alternative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002481950
Atypical work, or alternative work arrangements in U.S. parlance, has long been criticized for providing poorly-compensated employment. Although one group of atypical workers (contractors) seems to enjoy a wage premium, our cross-section results from the CPS and NLSY for the better-known...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002591952