Showing 1 - 10 of 23,932
This study reports an experiment that examines whether groups can better comply with theoretical predictions than individuals in contests. Our experiment replicates previous findings that individual players significantly overbid relative to theoretical predictions, incurring substantial losses....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014186327
We experimentally investigate, in an unstructured bargaining environment with commonlyknown money payoffs, the Attraction Effect and Compromise Effect (AE and CE) in bargaining,namely a tendency for bargainers to agree to an intermediate option (CE), or to an optionthat dominates another option...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013242076
This note contributes to the discussion of decision problems with imperfect recall from an empirical point of view. We argue that, using standard methods of experimental economics, it is impossible to induce (or control for) absent-mindedness of subjects. Nevertheless, it is possible to test...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009583877
This work presents experimental results on a coordination game in which agents must repeatedly choose between two sides, and a positive fixed payoff is assigned only to agents who pick the minoritarian side. We conduct laboratory experiments in which stationary groups of five players play the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014065544
While most papers on team decision-making find that teams behave more selfishly, less trustingly and less altruistically than individuals, Cason and Mui (1997) report that teams are more altruistic than individuals in a dictator game. Using a within-subjects design we re-examine group...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009731154
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003486255
We investigate the effect of absence of common knowledge on the outcomes of coordination games in a laboratory experiment. Using cognitive types, we can explain coordination failure in pure coordination games while differentiating between coordination failure due to first- and higher-order...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011537616
This paper deploys a novel experiment to compare four theories that explain both selfish and non-selfish cooperation. The four theories capture incomplete information (à la Kreps et al. (1982)) alongside the following four non-selfish motives: caring about others (Altruism), being conscientious...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013368347
We study the choice of a principal to either delegate a decision to a group of careerist experts, or to consult them individually and keep the decision-making power. Our model predicts a trade-off between information acquisition and information aggregation. On the one hand, the expected benefit...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012549435
This paper studies the effect of endogenous group formation on the outcome in two types of coordination games with multiple Pareto-ranked equilibria. Endogenous group formation means that in each period players are free to choose among two or more groups within which they want to play the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002881644