Showing 1 - 10 of 73
We show that close votes on shareholder proposals are disproportionately more likely to be won by management than by shareholder activists. Using a sample of shareholder proposals from 2003 to 2016, we uncover a large and discontinuous drop in the density of voting results at the 50% threshold....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012935124
Shareholder votes may create value because they force boards to implement proposals' content or because they signal shareholders' discontent. In order to distinguish these hypotheses, we collect data on the implementation of shareholder proposals. We show that the decision to implement proposals...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012974492
Strong corporate governance may bear some costs to shareholders when it leads to the departure of value-enhancing CEOs out of disagreement with the board. We test this hypothesis using the passing of shareholder proposals related to anti-takeover provisions in closely contested votes as a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013034801
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012033909
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003885490
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009711198
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010396070
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011387819
In the pre-Sarbanes-Oxley era corporate insiders were required to report trades in shares of their firm until the 10th of the month following the trade. This gave them considerable flexibility to time their trades and reports strategically, e.g., by executing a sequence of trades and reporting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003919398