Showing 1 - 10 of 727,931
their informational consequences may have lowered welfare. Surveying both theory and applications, we review the main …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014468249
When a principal’s monitoring information is private (non-verifiable), the agent should be concerned that the principal could misrepresent the information to reduce the agent’s wage or collect a monetary penalty. Restoring credibility may lead to an extreme waste of resources - the so-called...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014043494
There often exists a supermajority rule that enables the minority party to delay or prevent a vote on a bill. I construct a two-period model consisting of a representative voter, self-interested parties, and a media outlet. In the model, the majority party has an incentive to misrepresent the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014125981
We study an organization with a top management (principal) and multiple subunits (agents) with private information that determine the organization's aggregate efficiency. Under centralization, eliciting the agents' private information may induce the principal to manipulate aggregate information,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011904801
An agent may manipulate information when transmitting it to the principal. A direct response to this problem is to verify the information. The paper explores a situation where the principal engages in information verification herself or alternatively delegates it to the agent. The paper finds...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013077582
We consider an adverse selection model in which the agent can gather private information before the principal offers the contract. There are two scenarios. In scenario I, information gathering is a hidden action, while in scenario II, the principal observes the agent's information gathering...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013088898
We study a two-stage agency model in which the players take the role of the principal in turn. In the first stage, the board of the firm decides payment to the manager to induce him to set up and implement a project. In the second stage, the board evaluates the project to learn its value, and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012845510
A principal who has a project with uncertain returns must retain and incentivize an agent using promise of future payments and information control. The agent's effort produces output and facilitates information gathering. The principal controls the informativeness of the agent's effort by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012827152
A principal can allocate an indivisible good to an agent. The agent privately learns the value of the good while the principal privately learns the cost. Value and cost are correlated. The agent wants to have the good in any case. The principal wants to allocate whenever the value exceeds the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012832472
When a group of investors with dispersed private information jointly invest in a risky project, how should they divide the project payoff? A typical common stock contract rewards investors in proportion to their initial investment, but does it make the best use of investors' crowd wisdom? By...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012855112