Showing 1 - 10 of 2,747
cointegration between the nominal exchange rate and the relative prices. In particular, the Argentinean RER appears to be trend …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010289485
America, Asia and MENA). It covers the period 1979-2004, and carries out second-generation" tests for non-stationary panels …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010266058
America, Asia and MENA). It covers the period 1979-2004, and carries out second-generation tests for non-stationary panels …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010271098
America, Asia and MENA). It covers the period 1979-2004, and carries out second-generation tests for non-stationary panels …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010271575
The aim of this paper is to apply recently developed panel cointegration techniques proposed by Pedroni (1999, 2004 …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010264327
, are discussed and applied. The results obtained highlight the likely inadequacies of the standard cointegration and STAR …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011604869
, are discussed and applied. The results obtained highlight the likely inadequacies of the standard cointegration and Star …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010272367
The effect of the single currency on the Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) hypothesis is examined in this study for the 15 EU countries, vis a vis the US dollar, before and after the advent of the euro. Standard as well as nonlinear unit root tests are employed on the time series dimension. Unit...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010273678
Panel unit root tests of real exchange rates - as opposed to univariate tests - usually reject non-stationarity. These tests, however, could be biased if the real exchange rate contained MA roots. Indeed, two independent arguments claim that the real exchange rate, being a sum of a stationary...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010295811
In this paper we show the consequences of applying a panel unit root test when testing for a purchasing power parity relationship. The distribution of the tests investigated, including the IPS test of Im et al (1997), are influenced by a common stochastic trend which is usually not accounted...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010281460