Showing 1 - 7 of 7
In this paper we want to shed some light on what we mean by backward induction and forward induction reasoning in dynamic games. To that purpose, we take the concepts of common belief in future rationality (Perea [1]) and extensive form rationalizability (Pearce [2], Battigalli [3], Battigalli...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010369354
Type structures are a simple device to describe higher-order beliefs. But how can we check whether two types generate the same belief hierarchy? This paper generalizes the concept of a type morphism and shows that one type structure is contained in another if and only if the former can be mapped...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011545321
We provide comparable algorithms for the Dekel-Fudenberg procedure, iterated admissibility, proper rationalizability and full permissibility by means of the concepts of preference restrictions and likelihood orderings. We apply the algorithms for comparing iterated admissibility, proper...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012058688
We extend the Ståhl-Rubinstein alternating-offer bargaining procedure to allow players, prior to each bargaining round, to simultaneously and visibly commit to some share of the pie. If commitment costs are small but increasing in the committed share, then the unique outcome consistent with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012110635
Type structures are a simple device to describe higher-order beliefs. However, how can we check whether two types generate the same belief hierarchy? This paper generalizes the concept of a type morphism and shows that one type structure is contained in another if and only if the former can be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011709908
The concepts of sequential and quasi-perfect rationalizability are defined in an epistemic model by means of lexicographic probabilities. These are non-equilibrium analogs to sequential and quasi-perfect equilibrium, for which epistemic characterizations are provided. The defined...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010284381
Do individuals choose how to a solve a dynamic game or is their mode of reasoning a type-like predisposition? We show experimentally that an individual’s propensity to forwardly or backwardly induct is a function of (i) her belief whether an opponent’s previous action was a trembling hand...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011528008