Showing 1 - 10 of 43
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010715205
This paper examines the short-run adjustment process in the demand for money in the UK and in Germany with a view, particularly, to exploring the consequences of the different experiences of financial innovation in the two countries. Our hypothesis was that interest rate relativities might play...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005468244
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010651869
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010652008
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005296890
Economists have frequently argued that the money supply is endogenously determined. However, monetary regimes differ in important institutional respects and it may be that endogeneity may be true for some regimes and not for others. This paper tests for endogeneity of money supply in the G7...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005202891
In little more than twenty years, it has become widely accepted that the optimal design of monetary policy should include provision for a central bank that is independent of government influence. This is a remarkably short period of time for any idea in economics to become so widely-accepted....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005025588
This paper re-examines the relationship between stock market development and economic growth. It provides a theoretical basis for establishing the channel through which stock markets affect economic growth in the long run. It examines the hypothesis of endogenous growth models that financial...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005261250
Empirical work based on portfolio theories of the demand for money traditionally treat the quantity of money demanded as the outcome of a decision to allocate a fixed amount of wealth. By contrast, this paper argues that people commonly hold money at the same time that they borrow. Thus changes...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009227842
The causes of the "great inflation" of the sixteenth century have long been the subject of controversy. Since some major work in the 1930s, historians have argued over a "monetary" and a "real" interpretation. What we show in this paper is, first, that there was a dissenting opinion even then;...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010667511