Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Wicksell’s cumulative process (CP) was a ‘real’, not simply a monetary theory. Interest and Prices and later writings described two CP’S, one with constant real income, the cumulative inflationary process (CIP) and one with falling real income, the cumulative deflationary process (CDP)....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010902860
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010902897
A review essay on James C. W., Ahiakpor Classical Macroeconomics: Some Modern Variations and Distortions, London, Routledge, 2003, pp. 254.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010930449
When the money supply increased exogenously, Marshall's vs. Wicksell's versions of short run inflation transmission are shown to be different because of their ideas on money demand. During the approach to monetary equilibrium, the implication was that the demand for transactions cash balances...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005295206
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008490827
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008491263
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008528348
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010592684
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005394531
The difference between profit and interest was never clarified by the early classicalists, but J. S. Mill provided a partial answer: It was based on his two concepts of "abstinence". Interest was the reward for anonymous or "contract" personal saving without ownership--savings' financial...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005436460