Showing 1 - 10 of 33
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005299195
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005212972
We test the biasedness of unsolicited ratings relative to solicited ratings using the ex post firm performance measured by the long-run stock performance of firms following rating announcements and changes. We find that the announcements of new unsolicited ratings are followed by negative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010753679
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010596775
Previous studies show that the unsolicited ratings of S&P and Fitch are lower than the solicited ratings assigned by these two agencies. The unsolicited ratings of S&P and Fitch are based on publicly available information for a firm. However, no previous study has examined the unsolicited...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004965141
Roll (J Financ 43:541–566, <CitationRef CitationID="CR42">1988</CitationRef>) argues that firm-specific stock return volatility may result either from informed trading or from noise trading that is unrelated to information. In this paper we provide evidence that insider purchases are inversely related to the idiosyncratic volatility of...</citationref>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010989643
This paper is the first attempt to analyze Standard & Poor’s unsolicited and solicited ratings by using bond-yield data in Japan. Our findings show that there are differences in firm characteristics between firms seeking solicited ratings and those that receive unsolicited ratings. Firms with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010863582
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005680155
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010889096
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010889169