Showing 1 - 10 of 36
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005704242
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005823515
A strong Condorcet winner (SCW) is an alternative, x, that a majority of voters rank higher than z, for every other alternative, z. A weak Condorcet winner (WCW) is an alternative, y, that no majority of voters rank below any other alternative, z, but is not a SCW. There has been some confusion...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010987966
Monotonicity failure is widely considered a severe pathology in a voting method, and some authors regard a voting method that suffers from this pathology to be totally unacceptable. Of the various voting methods discussed prominently in the literature, five methods are subject to monotonicity...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010875112
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005215464
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005015361
Henry George anticipated the winner's curse phenomenon and suggested an antidote to prevent wasteful land speculation. In these ways his economic ideas still resonate today as part of modern finance theory. Copyright 2004 American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Inc..
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005157931
The excess burden of taxes can be reduced by shifting taxes from labor and capital onto land and by replacing progressive taxes with proportional taxes. This article uses a dynamic general equilibrium model to develop estimates of the magnitudes of reduction in excess burden that can be achieved...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010552762
The tax rule suggested by Groves and Ledyard is certainly an ingenious one, although there is no indication as to how one might fall upon that specific scheme. If offers Pareto optimal allocations, and in particular, budget balance,if each individual behaves competitively and faces the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010864503
In voting theory, monotonicity is the axiom that an improvement in the ranking of a candidate by voters cannot cause a candidate who would otherwise win to lose. The participation axiom states that the sincere report of a voter’s preferences cannot cause an outcome that the voter regards as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010865856