Showing 1 - 10 of 32
Five descriptive models of risky decision making are tested in this article, including four quantitative models and one heuristic account. Seven studies with 1802 participants were conducted to compare accuracy of predictions to new tests of first order stochastic dominance. Although the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005542725
The present paper reports a repeated experiment on decision making under risk where subjects have to tackle the same choice problems in several rounds. We fit a simple error model and investigate how behavior changes in the course of the experiment. Our analysis complements and extends Hey...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011164029
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011038768
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005809609
The dominance principle states that the judged price of gamble A should be equal to or greater than the judged price of gamble B whenever A's outcomes are equal to or better than the corresponding outcomes of B, holding everything else constant. Subjects often violate the dominance principle by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005709804
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008673733
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005431111
Three experiments tested if individuals show violations of transitivity in choices between risky gambles in linked designs. The binary gambles varied in the probability to win the higher (better) prize, the value of the higher prize, and the value of the lower prize. Each design varied two...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010575514
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005109341
Recently proposed models of risky choice imply systematic violations of transitivity of preference. Five studies explored whether people show patterns of intransitivity predicted by four descriptive models. To distinguish ?true? violations from those produced by ?error,? a model was fit in which...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005082856