In the presence of Pareto, non-dictatorship, full domain, and transitivity, an extremely weak independence condition disallows both anonymity and neutrality.

We investigate the implications of relaxing Arrow's independence of irrelevant alternatives axiom while retaining transitivity and the Pareto condition. Even a small relaxation opens a floodgate of possibilities for nondictatorial and efficient social choice.

Assuming an odd number of voters, E. S. Maskin recently provided a characterization of majority rule based on full transitivity. This paper characterizes majority rule with a set of axioms that includes two of Maskin's, dispenses with another, and contains weak versions of his other two axioms....

A feasible alternative x is a strong Condorcet winner if for every other feasible alternative y there is some majority coalition that prefers x to y. Let <InlineEquation ID="Equ1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX"><![CDATA[${\cal L}_{C}$]]></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (resp., <InlineEquation ID="Equ2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX"><![CDATA[$\wp_{C})$]]></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> denote the set of all profiles of linear (resp., merely asymmetric) individual preference relations for which a strong Condorcet...</equationsource></inlineequation></equationsource></inlineequation>

Suppose that g is a strategy-proof social choice rule on the domain of all profiles of complete and transitive binary relations that have exactly m indifference classes. If $m \ge 3$ and the range of g has three or more members, then g is dictatorial. If m = 2, then for any set X of feasible...