Showing 1 - 10 of 112
This paper studies a simple setting in which the contractual arrangements which determine the incentives for agents are not designed by a single central planner, but are themselves the outcome of a game among multiple noncooperatively acting principals. The notion of an Epsilon Contracting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005370616
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011211280
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011211288
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005311243
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005212504
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005331573
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005147288
In this study, we regard the oligopolistic-oligopsonistic markets within the framework of a “double auction†in which both buyers and sellers make bids. To this end, we introduce games where declarations of supply and demand functions (which need not be true) are treated as strategic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005155015
We examine the social desirability of learning about the regulated agent in a generalized principal-agent model with incomplete information. An interesting result we obtain is that there are situations in which the agent prefers a Bayesian regulator to have more, yet incomplete, information...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005110586
This paper analyzes the Baron and Myerson’s (B–M) (Econometrica 50: 911–930 [1982]) scheme of monopoly regulation, a standard representative of Bayesian mechanisms. As is well known, the hboxB–M mechanism (and other related mechanisms) have as an explicit starting point the assumption...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005711120