Showing 1 - 10 of 22
How do consumers reconcile conflicting motives for social group identification and individual uniqueness? Four studies demonstrate that consumers simultaneously pursue assimilation and differentiation goals on different dimensions of a single choice: they assimilate to their group on one...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010579036
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005827828
Our review of the learning and training literature revealed four common methods for training people to be more effective negotiators: didactic learning, learning via information revelation, analogical learning, and observational learning. We tested each of these methods experimentally in an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009191473
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005136399
People exhibit an immediacy bias when making judgments and decisions about humanitarian aid, perceiving as more deserving and donating disproportionately to humanitarian crises that happen to arouse immediate emotion. The immediacy bias produced different serial position effects, contingent on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009195124
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005348528
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005135877
While theories of signaling and conspicuous consumption suggest that more explicit markers facilitate communication, this article examines the utility of subtle signals. Four studies demonstrate that while less explicit branding increases the likelihood of misidentification (e.g., observers...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008756256
Consumers prefer brands positioned around identities they possess. Accordingly, the consumer identity literature emphasizes the importance of a clear fit between brands and target identities, suggesting that identity marketing that explicitly links brands to consumer identity should be most...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010797540
How does controversy affect conversation? Five studies using both field and laboratory data address this question. Contrary to popular belief, controversial things are not necessarily more likely to be discussed. Controversy increases likelihood of discussion at low levels, but beyond a moderate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010693614