Showing 1 - 10 of 21
What is wrong with today's banking system? The past few years have shown that risks in banking can impose significant costs on the economy. Many claim, however, that a safer banking system would require sacrificing lending and economic growth. The Bankers' New Clothes examines this claim and the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010681108
What is wrong with today's banking system? The past few years have shown that risks in banking can impose significant costs on the economy. Many claim, however, that a safer banking system would require sacrificing lending and economic growth. The Bankers' New Clothes examines this claim and the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010681708
The debate on banking regulation has been dominated by flawed and misleading claims. The title of our book The Bankers New Clothes: What's Wrong with Banking and What to Do about It (Princeton University Press, 2013, see bankersnewclothes.com) refers to flawed claims about banking and banking...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011183971
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005146153
We examine the pervasive view that “equity is expensive,” which leads to claims that high capital requirements are costly and would affect credit markets adversely. We find that arguments made to support this view are either fallacious, irrelevant, or very weak. For example, the return on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008693526
We examine the pervasive view that “equity is expensive,” which leads to claims that high capital requirements are costly for society and would affect credit markets adversely. We find that arguments made to support this view are fallacious, irrelevant to the policy debate by confusing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010751923
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005111954
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005131479
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005160039
We examine the pervasive view that "equity is expensive," which leads to claims that high capital requirements are costly and would affect credit markets adversely. We find that arguments made to support this view are either fallacious, irrelevant, or very weak. For example, the return on equity...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010627775