Showing 1 - 10 of 20
Empirical studies have shown that large auditors are more accurate than small auditors. The reputation hypothesis states that large auditors have more incentive to be accurate because an inaccurate report may lead to a loss of client-specific rents (DeAngelo, 1981). The deep pockets hypothesis...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005242391
A series of corporate failures in which auditors failed to warn about impending bankruptcy led to widespread criticism of the UK auditing profession during the last recession. For a sample of 976 quoted companies (1987-94), this paper shows that there are two reasons why audit reports were not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005312580
This paper tests whether companies engage in opinion shopping and examines the role of audit committees when auditors are dismissed (1996-98). There are three findings. First, US companies strategically dismiss when incumbent auditors are more likely to issue unfavorable audit opinions compared...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005045082
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005492957
We find that over six hundred auditors with fewer than 100 SEC clients exit the market following SOX. Compared to the non-exiting auditors, the exiting auditors are lower quality, where quality is gauged by: (1) avoidance of AICPA peer reviews and failure to comply with PCAOB rules, and (2)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009195217
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005306994
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005306997
We provide evidence that analyst coverage affects security issuance. First, firms covered by fewer analysts are less likely to issue equity as opposed to debt. They issue equity less frequently, but when they do so, it is in larger amounts. Moreover, these firms depend more on favorable market...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005309302
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009210532
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010641892