Showing 1 - 10 of 25
In this paper, we examine the relation between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and firm risk in controversial industry sectors. We develop and test two competing hypotheses of risk reduction and window dressing. Employing an extensive U.S. sample during the 1991–2010 period from...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010868186
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005235538
Recent research has documented the failure of market beta to capture the cross-section of expected returns within the context of a two-pass estimation methodology. However, the two-pass methodology suffers from the errors-in-variables (EIV) problem that could attenuate the apparent significance...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005303106
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005152377
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009210527
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009206620
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005717240
I provide a risk-based rational explanation for the seasonal regularity of January in stock returns by suggesting a common risk factor related to the information uncertainty caused by earnings volatility. When the two-factor model with the market risk factor and this common risk factor is used,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005832687
This paper examines the effect of commercial bank entry on underwriting spreads for IPOs, SEOs, and debt issues using a long time series that spans 30 years, from 1975 to 2004. We find that, on average, commercial banks charge lower spreads of approximately 72 basis points for IPOs, 43 basis...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005140414
This paper reexamines the explanatory power of beta, firm size, book-to-market equity, and the earnings-price ratio for average stock returns, correcting two currently controversial biases: selection bias in COMPUSTAT and the errors-in-variables (EIV) bias. After filling in the missing data on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005407243