Showing 1 - 10 of 10
This paper addresses a common criticism of certification processes: that they simultaneously generate excessive complexity, insuficient scrutiny and high rates of undue validation. We build a model of persuasion in which low and high types pool on their choice of complexity. A natural criterion...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009652972
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010978772
We analyze the expected effects of building a rail tunnel between Lyon and Turin on i) the market shares of the established and the new suppliers, and ii) consumer surplus. The prospective project consists of a 53km rail tunnel providing freight shippers with a new alpine path. We calibrate an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008556007
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004990399
This note offers characterizations of tightness and weak tightness. It shows that when the preference domain is that of continuous utility functions on the outcome space, the two notions are equivalent to the outcome closure property of Milgrom (2010a).
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008866922
This paper makes a first attempt at building a theory of interim Bayesian persuasion. I work in a minimalist model where a low or high type sender seeks validation from a receiver who is willing to validate high types exclusively. After learning her type, the sender chooses a complete...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010773961
This article asks when communication with certifiable information leads to complete information sharing. We consider Bayesian games augmented by a pre-play communication phase in which announcements are made publicly. We characterize the augmented games in which there exists a full disclosure...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010738802
This paper studies strategic disclosure by multiple senders competing for prizes awarded by a single receiver. They decide whether to disclose a piece of information that is both verifiable and equivocal (it can inuence the receiver both ways). The standard unrav- eling argument breaks down: if...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009652974
This paper studies selection rules i.e. the procedures committees use to choose whether to place an issue on their agenda. The main ingredient of the model is that committee members are uncertain about their final preferences at the selection stage: they only know the probability that they will...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010899971
This paper studies selection rules i.e. the procedures committees use to choose whether to place an issue on their agenda. The main ingredient of the model is that committee members are uncertain about their final preferences at the selection stage: they only know the probability that they will...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010929090