Showing 1 - 10 of 86
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005145879
Asymmetric information is a leading explanation for settlement failure that results in a costly trial. Typically, the information in question is assumed to have bilateral payoff relevance, meaning it affects the expected payoffs of both the plaintiff and defendant. When there is bilateral payoff...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009421447
As a result of Title IX, there has been a large increase in participation of women in college sports, while men's participation has remained roughly constant. We model the resource allocation decision across sports before and after Title IX was imposed. If the number of sports is held constant,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010812164
We consider models of pretrial negotiations where both costly voluntary disclosure and costly mandatory discovery are possible. When the uninformed party makes the final offer (the screening game), mandatory discovery will be utilized if it is not very costly, but voluntary disclosure will not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005779137
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005127322
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005485502
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005485628
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005485807
We extend the 1986 signaling model of Reinganum and Wilde by allowing for the possibility of negative expected value (NEV) suits. If filing costs are zero, the equilibrium consistent with the D1 refinement implies that settlement offers face a rejection rate of 100%. If filing costs are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005738791
We develop a model with asymmetric information, in which the uninformed party makes the offer. When the parties proceed to trial, their endogenous expenditures partially determine the outcome. The endogenous spending at trial can either strengthen or weaken the bargaining position of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010652455