Showing 1 - 10 of 14,459
We consider a heretofore unexplored explanation for why platforms, such as Internet service providers, might impose download limits on content consumers: doing so increases the degree to which those consumers view content providers’ products as substitutes. This, in turn, intensifies the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010905461
While some broadband providers have called Internet content and application providers free riders on their infrastructure, this is incorrect and misguided. End-users pay for their residential broadband providers for access to the Internet, and content providers pay their own ISPs for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008462844
This paper responds to arguments made in filings in the FCC’s broadband openness proceeding (GN Dkt. 09-191) and incorporates data made available since my January 14th filing in that proceeding. Newly available data confirm that there is limited competition in the broadband access marketplace....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008462845
We discuss the benefits of net neutrality regulation in the context of a two-sided market model in which platforms sell Internet access services to consumers and may set fees to content and applications providers “on the other side” of the Internet. When access is monopolized, we find that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005760651
We discuss the benefits of net neutrality regulation in the context of a two-sided market model in which platforms sell Internet access services to consumers and may set fees to content and applications providers “on the other side” of the Internet. When access is monopolized, we find that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005585461
This paper is an outgrowth of the filings in the FCC's broadband openness proceeding that focused on the issue of networks neutrality. Newly available data confirm that competition in the broadband access marketplace is limited. Wireless broadband access services are unlikely to act as effective...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010602873
Se analizan varias definiciones de neutralidad de red; se encuentra que en todas se asume implicitamente un esquema de arquitectura abierta que favorezca la entrada de nuevos proveedores. Sin embargo, hay diferencias sobre si se debe analizar la discriminacion en precios que pueden implementar los...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010628377
Pricing of Internet access has been characterized by two properties. Parties are directly billed only by the Internet Service Provider (ISP) through which they connect to the Internet and the ISP charges them on the basis of the amount of information transmitted rather than its content. These...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008763998
We discuss network neutrality regulation of the Internet in the context of a two-sided market model. Platforms sell broadband Internet access services to residential consumers and may set fees to content and application providers on the Internet. When access is monopolized, cross-group...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011056742
The vast majority of US residential consumers face a monopoly or duopoly in broadband Internet access. Up to now, the Internet was characterized by a regime of “net neutrality” where there was no discrimination in the price of a transmitted information packet based on the identities of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005622761