Showing 1 - 10 of 28
We study a contract design setting in which the contracting parties cannot commit not to renegotiate previous contract agreements. In particular, we characterize the outcome functions that are implementable for an uninformed principal and an informed agent if, having observed the agent's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011263577
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005242283
This paper analyzes an infinite-horizon sequential bargaining game (with one-sided offers) between a buyer and a seller when the buyer's valuation depends on the seller's; the seller knows the value of the object and the buyer does not. The influence of relative discount factors on the solution...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005242828
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005248581
Bester and Strausz [Bester, H., Strausz, R., 2001. Contracting with imperfect commitment and the revelation principle: the single agent case. Econometrica 69, 1077-1098] showed that the revelation principle is invalid in a multi-agent, no-commitment setting. We show that if transfers are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005296837
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005299712
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005323162
A one-shot simultaneous-offers bargaining game is presented in which the unique pure strategy equilibrium offers are identical to those of the infinite-horizon Rubinstein alternating-offers game. For each player there is a small probability that his or her proposal will not arrive. A...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005328786
This paper studies a general model of holdup in a setting encompassing the models of Segal (1999) and Che and Hausch (1999) among others. It is shown that if renegotiation is modeled as an infinite-horizon noncooperative bargaining game, then, with a simple initial contract, an efficient...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005332933
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010637306