Showing 1 - 10 of 22
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012171943
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009504226
We provide a framework for analyzing bilateral mergers when there is two-sided asymmetric information about firms' types. We show that there is always a no-merger equilibrium where firms do not consent to a merger, irrespective of their type. There may also be a cut-off equilibrium if the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010315502
We analyze a Bayesian merger game under two-sided asymmetric information about firm types. We show that the standard prediction of the lemons market model-if any, only low-type firms are traded-is likely to be misleading: Merger returns, i.e. the difference between pre- and post-merger profits,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010315535
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003643119
We analyze a Bayesian merger game under two-sided asymmetric information about firm types. We show that the standard prediction of the lemons market model–if any, only low-type firms are traded–is likely to be misleading: Merger returns, i.e. the difference between pre- and post-merger...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002202342
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001690959
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001927967
We consider market dynamics in a reduced form model. In the simplest version, there are two investors and several small noninvesting firms. In each period, one investor can acquire a small firm, the other investor decides about market entry. After that all firms play an oligopoly game. We derive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001729422
We provide a framework for analyzing bilateral mergers when there is two-sided asymmetric information about firms’ types. We show that there is always a "no-merger" equilibrium where firms do not consent to a merger, irrespective of their type. There may also be a "cut-off" equilibrium if the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001729427