Showing 1 - 10 of 3,597
, but allowing shareholders to vote on more issues, such as executive compensation, may not affect the quality of governance … large shareholders and management. This is because majority rule offers little incentive for small shareholders to vote. I … majority of voters. Therefore, for issues on which management and small shareholders are likely to agree, majority rule is a …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013091344
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012423556
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011554663
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012114360
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012969942
We explore Time-Phased Voting (“TPV”), an arrangement in which long-term shareholders receive more votes per share than … short-term shareholders. TPV has gained prominence in recent years as a proposed remedy for perceived corporate myopia. We …-class stock. By decreasing the influence of short-term shareholders, TPV may encourage managers to act in the long-term interests …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012971472
requires the shareholder voting rule to be immune to certain manipulative techniques used by shareholders to hide their …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012415597
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012589366
We challenge the common law rule that shareholders can generally vote as they please, even if their intent or the … property rights and shareholders can bind themselves to vote as they please – are unpersuasive. We then argue that (1) the … general meeting is the company’s agent; (2) shareholders are generally not personally liable for the consequences of the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014361587
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010401958