Showing 1 - 10 of 98
This paper evaluated differences between yields of no-tillage compared to conventional or reduced tillage and their associated downside risk. Six crops were evaluated along with how those yields and risks differed by various environmental factors such geographic location, precipitation, soil...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008922691
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011069091
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010880486
This article examines what differentiates "socially responsible" farmers (i.e., those who rank environmental benefits higher than profit, based on a Likert style ranking) from farmers who make decisions based solely on financial criteria. A proportional odds model (POM) is proposed to estimate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010880660
A multiobjective optimization model integrating with high-resolution geographical data was applied to examine the optimal switchgrass supply system in Tennessee that considers both feedstock cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the system. Results suggest that the type of land converted...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010914259
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010915960
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010918542
Precision Farming by Cotton Producers in Eleven Southern States: Results from the 2005 Southern Precision Farming Survey
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008560278
Precision Farming by Cotton Producers in Six Southern States: Results from the 2001 Southern Precision Farming Survey
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008560279
Precision Farming by Cotton Producers in Twelve Southern States: Results from the 2009 Southern Cotton Precision Farming Survey
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008560280